Information Notice No. 90-51: Supplement 1:Failures of Voltage-Dropping Resistors in the Power Supply Circuitry of Electric Governor Systems
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 24, 1991 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 90-51, SUPPLEMENT 1: FAILURES OF VOLTAGE-DROPPING RESISTORS IN THE POWER SUPPLY CIRCUITRY OF ELECTRIC GOVERNOR SYSTEMS Addressees All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors. Purpose The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice supplement to alert addressees to a recent failure of a voltage-dropping resistor in the power supply for the electronic control module of an emergency diesel generator (EDG) governor system at the Waterford Steam Electric Station. The resistor had been in service for approximately 15 months. The resistor failure resulted in the inoperability of the EDG. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. Description of Circumstances On August 20, 1991, at the Waterford Steam Electric Station (Waterford), EDG "A" failed to maintain rated speed following a successful start during a surveillance test. After reaching rated speed of 600 rpm, engine speed began to fluctuate, dropping to a low of 280 rpm. This prompted the licensee to shut down the EDG and declare it inoperable. The licensee performed an investigation and determined that the speed anomaly resulted from the failure of one of the two voltage-dropping resistors in the power supply for the electronic control module for the governor system on the EDG. The NRC staff described this failure mode in NRC Information Notice (IN) 90-51, issued August 8, 1990. In IN 90-51, the staff discussed failures of voltage-dropping resistors in the power supplies for the electronic control modules for EDGs at the Commonwealth Edison Company's (CEC's) Braidwood and Byron Stations. CEC conducted a root cause analysis and concluded that normal "aging" was the most likely cause of the resistor degradation or failure. CEC subsequently began a preventive maintenance program that included periodic replacement of the voltage-dropping resistors. After reviewing the original information notice, the Waterford licensee instituted a preventive maintenance program to replace the resistors every 18 months. However, the resistor that recently failed at the 9110210298 . IN 90-51, Supplement 1 October 24, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Waterford Station had been in service for only about 15 months after having been replaced as part of the newly adopted preventive maintenance program. Although this is the only early failure of these voltage-dropping resistors of which the NRC staff is aware, it appears that these resistors can prematurely fail even before 18 months and that periodic replacement may not ensure adequate availability of the EDGs to perform their intended function. Following the publication of IN 90-51, Woodward Governor Company (Woodward) stated, in a letter to the NRC, that they did not concur with using periodic replacement of the two resistors, of the original design, as an acceptable preventive maintenance procedure. Woodward stated that whenever the battery charging system is in operation, system voltage approached the design capacity of the dual resistor assembly. The higher voltage developed by the charging system caused more current to flow through the resistors, resulting in more heat generation. The increased heat generated at the higher voltage level would tend to reduce the life expectancy of the assembly. The letter from Woodward described the design of the governor control system and stated that several product improvements had been made that offer certain advantages over the original design. Specifically, the letter stated that a replacement assembly for the dual voltage-dropping resistor configuration had been developed. The replacement assembly substitutes a single resistor for the dual resistor design. Besides the fact that the single resistor assembly is of greater thermal capacity than the dual resistor assembly, the letter states that, because of the design of the governor system, use of the single resistor has distinct advantages over the dual resistor configuration. With the single voltage-dropping resistor of the replacement assembly, a resistor failure would result in a backup mechanical governor taking control of speed. The EDG would then continue to operate at rated speed. The licensee for Waterford has concluded that the new design has advantages over the dual resistor design and has installed the new resistor assembly in each of its EDG governor systems. This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational Events Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contacts: N. Fields, NRR (301) 492-1173 O. Chopra, NRR (301) 492-3265 Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices .ENDEND
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021