Information Notice No. 85-96: Temporary Strainers Left Installed in Pump Suction Piping
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 85-96 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, DC 20555 December 23, 1985 Information Notice No. 85-96: TEMPORARY STRAINERS LEFT INSTALLED IN PUMP SUCTION PIPING Addressees: All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or a construction permit (CP). Purpose: This information notice is provided to alert recipients about a potentially significant problem pertaining to temporary construction strainers left in- stalled in the suction piping of safety-related pumps. It is suggested that recipients review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude a similar problem occurring at their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this information notice do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. Description of Circumstances: Davis-Besse 1 On August 2, 1985, at Davis-Besse Unit 1, operated by Toledo Edison Company (TEC), personnel discovered temporary strainers left installed in the suction piping of two high-pressure injection (HPI) pumps. The strainers were installed during plant construction to prevent debris from entering pump internals. These temporary construction strainers are normally removed before hot functional testing. Other pumps in safety-related systems including the decay heat removal, containment spray, and component cooling water systems, have subsequently been re-checked by radiograph or actual disassembly; however, no strainers were found. With the Davis-Besse plant in cold shutdown, the first HPI pump strainer was found during maintenance to repair a flange leak. The discovery occurred when TEC Engineering processed a report indicating strainer damage. Evidently the strainer was damaged as maintenance personnel attempted to remove what appeared to be a pipe spacer ring. The ring was actually part of the strainer. Strainer identification was made difficult because, once installed, the visible ring closely resembled the spacer rings used to replace strainers in other systems. Strainers normally were removed from the ring and then the rings were reinserted as pipe spacers. The stainless steel strainers consist of a perforated conical basket that is attached to a circular flange plate bolted to pump suction piping. 8512190037 . IN 85-96 December 23, 1985 Page 2 of 3 The principal cause for the temporary strainer oversight at Davis-Besse was a failure of the system turnover checklist to include construction strainer removal after system flushing. Summer On August 27, 1985, during maintenance on the "B" train of the reactor building spray (RBS) pump, personnel at the V.C. Summer nuclear power plant found a startup construction strainer installed in the pump suction piping. The strainer, installed during the 1982 plant startup, was removed and the RBS pump returned to service. Similarly on August 29, 1985, maintenance personnel determined that the suction piping for the "A" train RBS pump had a construction strainer installed. This strainer also was removed and the pump returned to service. A review of quality assurance records confirmed that strainers installed for pumps in other safety-related systems were removed before plant startup. However, records for the RBS system indicated that the strainers had not been removed. Although left installed in the RBS system since startup, the construction strainers were checked annually for debris accumulation as part of a preventive maintenance program. Other checks also were performed to determine if structural failure had occurred. Apparently the strainers were assumed to be a permanent design feature rather than a temporary one. Differences in the notation on system drawings may have contributed to the false assumption that the strainers were to be installed permanently. RBS system drawings, unlike those of other safety-related systems, noted the location of temporary strainers with a symbol which was described in the legend. Other system draw-ings had a specific footnote about the location on the drawing. Discussion: There are several mechanisms by which temporary construction strainers could cause safety systems to be made inoperable. These include physical failure of the non-safety related strainer which could cause pump or valve failures, flow restrictions under extremes of pump flows associated with an accident, and accumulated blockage of the construction strainer resulting insufficient flow. An example of impaired operations specific to strainers in systems used during the recirculation mode is temporary strainer clogging by debris passed through the intake screen, resulting in loss of pump net positive suction head. Because construction strainers were not designed as safety related components and their modes of failure or contribution to system inoperability were not evaluated, such temporary strainers constitute an unanalyzed plant condition. . IN 85-96 December 23, 1985 Page 3 of 3 No specific action or written response is required by this information notice. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or the tech- nical contact listed below. Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Technical Contact: Ronald Young, IE (301) 492-8985 Attachment: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021